Dentists’ attitudes toward chairside screening for medical conditions

Sekundær artikel

DATO:

Dansk

English

Background - Results of previous studies demonstrated the effectiveness of chairside medical screening by dentists to identify patients at increased risk of experiencing cardiovascular- associated events. In this study, the authors assessed dentists’ attitudes, willingness and perceived barriers regarding chairside medical screening in the dental office. Methods - A national, random sample of U.S. general dentists was surveyed by mail by means of an anonymous questionnaire that involved a five-point Likert scale (1 = very important/ very willing; 5 = very unimportant/very unwilling). Friedman nonparametric analysis of variance was used to compare response items within each question. Results - Of 1,945 respondents, most were male (82.3 percent), white (85.7 percent) and 40 to 60 years old (59.4 percent) and had practiced for more than 10 years (84.5 percent). The majority thought it was important for dentists to conduct screening for hypertension (85.8 percent), cardiovascular disease (76.8 percent), diabetes mellitus (76.6 percent), hepatitis (71.5 percent) and human immunodeficiency virus infection (68.8 percent). Respondents were willing to refer patients for consultation with physicians (96.4 percent), collect oral fluids for salivary diagnostics (87.7 percent), conduct medical screenings that yield immediate results (83.4 percent) and collect blood via finger stick (55.9 percent). Respondents were significantly more willing (P < 0.001) to collect saliva than height and weight measurements or blood via finger stick (mean ranks: 2.05, 2.96 and 3.05, respectively). Insurance was significantly less important (P < 0.001) than time, cost, liability or patients’ willingness (mean ranks: 3.51, 2.96, 2.94, 2.83 and 2.77, respectively). Conclusions - Dentists considered medical screening important and were willing to incorporate it into their practices. Additional education and practical implementation strategies are necessary to address perceived barrier

info

Nr. 10 | 2010

info

Nr. 10 | 2010

forfattere

Barbara L. Greenberg

associate professor, MSc, PhD, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, and the acting associate dean for research, Office of Research, New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, USA

Julie Frantsve-Hawley

director, RDH, PhD, Research Institute and Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry, Division of Science, American Dental Association, Chicago, USA

Mel L. Kantor

professor, DDS, MPH, PhD, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, and a professor, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway, USA

Michael Glick

professor, DMD, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, USA